marcmagus | Odd (Reply)

S	M	T	W	T	F	S
						1
2	3	4	5	6	7	8
9	10	11	12	13	14	15
16	17	18	19	20	21	22
23	24	25	26	27	28	29
30

1hand - 3 uses
allergies - 4 uses
cabinet - 7 uses
calendar - 3 uses
chromium - 4 uses
computer - 3 uses
convention - 8 uses
cvd - 6 uses
dance - 24 uses
devnull - 3 uses
drugs - 3 uses
dw - 24 uses
encoding - 8 uses
fail - 2 uses
food - 9 uses
games - 5 uses
geeky - 2 uses
gentoo - 3 uses
hair - 12 uses
hands - 10 uses
health - 4 uses
house - 3 uses
humor - 4 uses
internet - 3 uses
jlj - 4 uses
lenses - 3 uses
linux - 8 uses
lj - 12 uses
meme - 4 uses
music - 3 uses
navel-gazing - 6 uses
nethack - 4 uses
newport - 4 uses
noncon - 8 uses
pain - 3 uses
politics - 6 uses
polyphasic sleep - 8 uses
programming - 3 uses
quest prizes - 4 uses
rant - 8 uses
regency - 8 uses
science! - 6 uses
test - 9 uses
tools - 36 uses
tv - 4 uses
twitter - 3 uses
ui - 5 uses
vim - 5 uses
wtf - 3 uses
zelda - 7 uses

Driving home from a very pleasant family dinner last night, I was scanning the radio and came across "All I Wanna Do is Make Love to You". I think, "Hmmm, ok, cool, I'll stick to this station for a bit." The song ends, and the station announces the radio program that's currently on, "Love Songs at Night"

Now, granted, the song is (obviously) about making love, and it definitely has content describing a number of different kinds of love, and I think there's something quite beautiful about the song, but I'm not really sure it fits in the "love song" genre, as I understand it.

Go, go gadget cognitive dissonance.